ATI FireMV 2250 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
R500
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
