ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+1114%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2880
16
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GK180
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
