ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
+196%
1.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
54.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
170W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GF114
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
