ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 740
+73%
0.763 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2014
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.78 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
762.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
64W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GK107
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GK107-425-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
