ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+63%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2010
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GF108
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
