ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+877%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
G96C
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
