ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+2100%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 GE
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
G98
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
