ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
+500%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2010
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1600
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Cypress
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
