ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+25%
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV730
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
