ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+1715%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Capsaicin
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0
