ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
+12%
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireGL
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV670
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
