ATI FireGL V8650 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+510%
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
DG2-128
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
