ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
+886%
4.339 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireGL
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GA107
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
Unknown
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
