ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
+1855%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
159W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Capsaicin
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
