ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 159W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
+340%
0.44 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
159W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GF119
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
