ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (17W vs 159W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
+450%
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
80
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
159W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Cedar
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
