ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 159W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
+1275%
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
159W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV620
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
