ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 159W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
+205%
0.44 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireGL
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
120
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
159W
TDP
73W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV630
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
