ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+2770%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
16
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
159W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GA100
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
