Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7700 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X

ATI FireGL V7700 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
16064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI350X +14405%
72.09 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1126 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
72.06GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
256
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
CDNA Next
RV670 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
185 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net