ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7700
+397%
0.497 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1126 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GF119
RV670 GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
