ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
+2033%
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Fiji
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
