ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
+1392%
5.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2014
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Vesuvius
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
