Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +393%
1.894 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Pitcairn
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net