ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
PG506 232
+2587%
10.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireGL
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
320
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
165W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GA100
R600 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
