ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (127W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
+55%
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
289W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GT200B
R600 GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
