ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 40.06GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (49W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
+109%
0.803 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
40.06GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.368 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.47 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
49W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GK208
R600 GL
GPU Variant
GK208-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
