ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
Lower TDP (90W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
+146%
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2008
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
127W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
G94
R600 GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
