ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
+100%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Cape Verde
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
