ATI FireGL V7600 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
+383%
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Cayman
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
