ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
+59%
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Cayman
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
