ATI FireGL V7600 vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
+62%
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
127W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Turks
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
