ATI FireGL V7600 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
+1100%
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
127W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV620
R600 GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
