Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +3189%
12.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
16
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GA100
R600 GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net