ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
T1000
+1202%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
120
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
