Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
5000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +11900%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
120
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

89W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
AD104
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net