ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
+4166%
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Fiji
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
