ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
PG506 232
+5275%
10.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireGL
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
120
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GA100
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
