ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
72 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
NVS 510
+59%
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2012
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GK107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
