ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+1592%
3.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
195W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GK104
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
