ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
+210%
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
120
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
289W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GT200B
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
