ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
+1275%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2010
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1600
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Cypress
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
