Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 89W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +643%
1.428 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

89W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net