ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+4059%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Capsaicin
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0
