ATI FireGL V5600 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+1713%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
