ATI FireGL V5600 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+1300%
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
