ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
+659%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
