ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+9143%
13.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
FireGL
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2150 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.62 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
832.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Navi 22
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT
(215-127000144)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
