ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 160W)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2589MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6600 XT
+7261%
10.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2021
FireGL
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1968 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2589 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.7 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.21 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.60 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
662.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Navi 23
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 23 XT
(215-130000006)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
