ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
+5588%
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Fiji
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
